Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 MT 169 - State v. M. Stutzman

State v. M. Stutzman’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

26 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kills on Top v. State · State v. Favel · State v. Daniels · State v. Harris · State v. Duffy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “failing to review the claimed error may result in a manifest miscarriage of justice, may leave unsettled the question of the fundamental fairness of the trial or proceedings, or may compromise the integrity of the judicial process.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We use our inherent power of common law plain error review sparingly, on a case-by-case basis, and only in a narrow class of cases.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “we consider whether the prosecutor's comments were improper and whether they prejudiced the defendant's right to a fair trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.