Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 MT 18 - Lacey v. State

Lacey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

27 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2242 · 18 U.S.C. § 2251 (Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Wong Sun v. United States · Whitlow v. State · In re D.B. · State v. Herrman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, the defendant must show that counsel’s performance was deficient. This requires showing that counsel made errors so serious that counsel was not functioning as the “counsel” guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment. Second, the defendant must show that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense. This requires showing that counsel’s errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial, a trial whose result is reliable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.