Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 MT 311 - State v. L. Akers

State v. L. Akers’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

89
cited by 89 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

89 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Addington v. Texas · State v. Finley · State v. Gallagher · Unified Industries, Inc. v. Easley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 89 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A mere assertion that constitutional rights are implicated or that failure to review the claimed error may result in a manifest miscarriage of justice is insufficient to implicate the plain error doctrine.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[I]f a defendant fails to properly preserve his or her issue for ** appeal, we apply the plain error standard of review and the defendant has the burden of proof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.