Allmon v. Allmon’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 2021
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Fischer v. Fischer · Ruff v. Ruff · Heinle v. Heinle · Kostelecky v. Kostelecky · State Ex Rel. K.B. v. Bauer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he respective ages of the parties, their earning ability, the duration of the marriage and conduct of the parties during the marriage, their station in life, the circumstances and necessities of each, their health and physical condition, their financial circumstances as shown by the property owned at the time, its value at the time, its income-producing capacity, if any, whether accumulated before or after the marriage, and such other matters as may be material.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Brew v. Brew · Knudson v. Knudson“A finding of fact is clearly erroneous if it is induced by an erroneous view of the law, if there is no evidence to support it, or if, after a review of the entire record, we are left with a definite and firm conviction a mistake has been made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Knudson v. Knudson“Property division and spousal support are interrelated and intertwined and often must be considered together.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tarver v. Tarver
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.