Rath v. Rath’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Falcon v. State · Sall v. Sall · Millang v. Hahn · Rath v. Rath · Rath v. Rath
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'A party seeking a contempt sanction under N.D.C.C. ch. 27-10 must clearly and satisfactorily prove the alleged contempt was committed.' " Sall v. Sall , 2011 ND 202 , ¶ 7, 804 N.W.2d 378 (quoting Prchal , 2011 ND 62 , ¶ 5, 795 N.W.2d 693 ). "To warrant a remedial sanction for contempt, there must be a willful and inexcusable intent to violate a court order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Upton v. Nolan“To warrant a remedial sanction for contempt, there must be a willful and inexcusable intent to violate a court order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Upton v. Nolan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.