Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 ND 138 - Rath v. Rath

Rath v. Rath’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
February 2023
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 18001

Relies on Paulson v. Paulson · Rath v. Rath · Rath v. Rath · Rath v. Rath · Rath v. Rath

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a. The date of the notice of assignment or reassignment of a judge for trial of the case; b. The date of notice that a trial has been scheduled; or c. The date of service of any ex parte order in the case signed by the judge against whom the demand is filed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “over which the employee does not have significant influence or control,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.