Booen v. Appel’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
December 2025
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Stout v. Stout · Hawkinson v. Hawkinson · Prchal v. Prchal · Silbernagel v. Silbernagel · Lauer v. Lauer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'The district court has broad discretion in making contempt decisions.' Rath v. Rath , 2017 ND 128 , ¶ 9, 895 N.W.2d 306 . This Court will disturb a district court's contempt determination only if the court abused its discretion. Id. 'A district court abuses its discretion when it acts in an arbitrary, unreasonable, or unconscionable manner; its decision is not the product of a rational mental process leading to a reasoned determination; or it misinterprets or misapplies the law.' Id. This Court's review of a district court's determination on contempt is very limited. Sall v. Sall , 2011 ND 202 , ¶ 7, 804 N.W.2d 378 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Upton v. Nolan“'A party seeking a contempt sanction under N.D.C.C. ch. 27-10 must clearly and satisfactorily prove the alleged contempt was committed.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Upton v. Nolan“To warrant a remedial sanction for contempt, there must be a willful and inexcusable intent to violate a court order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Upton v. Nolan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.