Nusviken v. Johnston’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2020
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hartvickson v. Haugen · Estate of Amundson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[A] document that purports to assert a lien against real or personal property of any person and: a. Is not expressly provided for by a specific state or federal statute; b. Does not depend upon the consent of the owner of the property affected; and c. Is not an equitable or constructive lien imposed by a state or federal court of competent jurisdiction."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.