Mitzel v. Larson’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2022
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Investors Title Insurance Co. v. Herzig · Cusey v. Nagel · Combs v. Lund · Hanisch v. Kroshus · Interest of J.A.H.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is not enough to show the respondent's actions are unwanted; rather, the petitioner must show specific unwanted acts that are intended to affect the safety, security, or privacy of another person”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. J.B. v. R.B.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.