State v. Webster’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 195 L. Ed. 2d 560 - Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert Bernard · State v. Smuda · State v. Kruckenberg · Aamodt v. North Dakota Department of Transportation · Dettler v. Sprynczynatyk
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We conclude the requirements for an officer to request an onsite breath screening test constitute a legal issue for determination before trial and are not essential elements of the crime of refusing an onsite breath screening test under N.D.C.C. § 39-08-01(1)(e)(3). We therefore conclude the district court did not err in refusing to instruct the jury on the legal requirements for a law enforcement officer to request an onsite breath screening test.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Taylor“has reason to believe that the individual committed a moving traffic violation ... and in conjunction with the violation ... the officer has, through the officer's observations, formulated an opinion that the individual's body contains alcohol.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Taylor“The defendant bears the burden of showing the evidence reveals no reasonable inference of guilt when viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Beltran
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.