Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 OHIO 1464 - State v. Becraft

State v. Becraft’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Santobello v. New York · Puckett v. United States · Williams v. People of State of New York · State v. Long · State v. Xie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “instead of applying an abuse of discretion standard, as [the court] ha[d] previously done in restitution cases prior to Marcum , the proper standard of review for analyzing the imposition of restitution as a part of a felony sentence is whether it complies with R.C. 2953.08(G)(2)(b), i.e., whether it is clearly and convincingly contrary to law”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “not exceed the amount of the economic loss suffered by the victim as a direct and proximate result of the commission of the offense”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.