State v. Mutter (Slip Opinion)’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
June 2024
most recently cited
35 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · Benton v. Maryland · Brown v. Ohio · United States v. Jorn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Appellate courts review de novo the denial of a motion to dismiss an indictment on the grounds of double jeopardy, because it is a pure question of law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jama · State v. Soto“be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Evick · State v. Jama“Zima at ¶ 20, quoting State v. Thomas , 61 Ohio St.2d 254 , 259, 400 N.E.2d 897 (1980), overruled on other grounds , State v. Crago , 53 Ohio St.3d 243 , 559 N.E.2d 1353 (1990), syllabus. The United States Supreme Court has summarized the Blockburger test as an inquiry that asks”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Soto
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.