Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 OHIO 4010 - State v. McComb

State v. McComb’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Thompkins · Neil v. Biggers · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin · Manson v. Brathwaite · State v. Dehass

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rather, a prior juvenile adjudication and conviction are treated as alternative elements necessary to establish the offense of having weapons while under disability. Hand does not ban the use of a prior juvenile adjudication as an element of an offense; rather, Hand bans the use of a juvenile adjudication to enhance a penalty by treating the adjudication as an adult conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “'it is fundamentally unfair to treat a juvenile adjudication as a previous conviction that enhances either the degree of or the sentence for a subsequent offense committed as an adult.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[u]nlike the statute that was struck down in Hand , the statute at issue, R.C. 2923.13(A)(2), does not treat a prior juvenile adjudication as a conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.