State v. Hunter’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

7 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “'a delicate judgment' " and a case-by-case consideration of the particular circumstances. State v. Walls , 96 Ohio St.3d 437 , 2002-Ohio-5059 , 775 N.E.2d 829 , ¶ 52, quoting [ Marion at 325, 92 S.Ct. 455 ]. A court must "consider the evidence as it exists when the indictment is filed and the prejudice the defendant will suffer at trial due to the delay.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Lynch

2. “and a case-by-case consideration of the particular circumstances. State v. Walls , 96 Ohio St.3d 437 , 2002-Ohio-5059 , 775 N.E.2d 829 , ¶ 52, quoting [ Marion at 325, 92 S.Ct. 455 ]. A court must”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Lynch

3. “'a defendant's own general assertion that he does not remember details of an event that occurred nearly 20 years ago does not, in and of itself, constitute actual prejudice.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Kafantaris