Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 Ohio 4253 - State v. Doughman

State v. Doughman’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Klopfer v. State of North Carolina · State v. Adams (Slip Opinion) · State v. Hull · State v. Blackburn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although 'judges should strive to comply with these directory guidelines,' R.C. 2938.11(F) does not provide a clear legal right to the vacation of convictions based on noncompliance with that provision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The time requirement in R.C. 2938.11(F) * * * is directory, not mandatory”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.