State v. Fridley’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2023
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Crawford v. Washington · State v. Burnside · Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts · State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An appellate court, however, independently reviews the trial court's legal conclusions based on those facts and determines, without deference to the trial court's decision, whether as a matter of law, the facts satisfy the appropriate legal standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Moore“Miranda defines custodial interrogation as any 'questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of any action in any significant way.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Moore“In determining whether an individual was in custody during an interrogation by the police, the court must examine the totality of the circumstances surrounding the interrogation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Moore
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.