Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 Ohio 4395 - State v. Taylor

State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · Bordenkircher v. Hayes · State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion) · State v. Jenkins · AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] sentence vindictively imposed on a defendant for exercising his constitutional right to a jury trial is contrary to law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “the record does not support the sentencing court's findings”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “the sentence is otherwise contrary to law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.