Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 OHIO 4452 - State v. Armengau

State v. Armengau’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hen an offender, as part of a course of criminal conduct, commits offenses in different jurisdictions, the offender may be tried for all of those offenses in any jurisdiction in which one of those offenses or any element of one of those offenses occurred.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “Offenses 'committed as part of the same transaction or chain of events, or in furtherance of the same purpose or objective' serve as 'prima facie evidence of a course of criminal conduct.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.