State v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
October 2020
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · State v. Thompkins · Neil v. Biggers · State v. Bradley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“before ordering him to serve the three-year firearm specifications consecutively). {¶ 107} We therefore find Welninski's first assignment of error not well-taken. 6. Costs of Prosecution {¶ 108} In his sixth and final assignment of error, Welninski argues that the trial court erred when it imposed the costs of prosecution without considering his present or future ability to pay. {¶ 109} In its judgment entry, the trial court issued a single sentence with regard to costs:”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Welninski“for each of the two most serious specifications of which [Welninski] was convicted,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Welninski
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.