State v. Filip’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2022
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Thompkins · State v. Jenks · Tibbs v. Florida · State v. Burnside · State v. Mills
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'on physiological factors (e.g., odor of alcohol, glossy or bloodshot eyes, slurred speech, confused appearance) to demonstrate that a person's physical and mental ability to drive was impaired.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Martin“[I]n [OVI] prosecutions, the [S]tate is not required to establish that a defendant was actually impaired while driving, but rather, need only show an impaired driving ability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Martin“'Virtually any lay witness, without special qualifications, may testify as to whether or not an individual is intoxicated.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Martin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.