Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 Ohio 5642 - Knoefel v. Connick

Knoefel v. Connick’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co. · Grava v. Parkman Township · Goodson v. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. · Krahn v. Kinney · National Amusements, Inc. v. City of Springdale

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it appears from the evidence * * * that reasonable minds can come to but one conclusion and that conclusion is adverse to the party against whom the motion for summary judgment is made, that party being entitled to have the evidence * * * construed most strongly in the party's favor.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he reviewing court conducts an independent review of the evidence before the trial court and renders a decision de novo, i.e., as a matter of law and without deference to the conclusions of the lower court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.