Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 OHIO 5794 - State v. Boatright

State v. Boatright’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Jenks · State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion) · State v. Madrigal · 33 Ohio App. 3d 339 - State v. Otten

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court on motion of a defendant or on its own motion, after the evidence on either side is closed, shall order the entry of a judgment of acquittal of one or more offenses charged in the indictment, information, or complaint, if the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction of such offense or offenses. The court may not reserve ruling on a motion for judgment of acquittal made at the close of the state's case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[A]n appellate court may vacate or modify a felony sentence on appeal only if it determines by clear and convincing evidence that: (1) the record does not support the trial court's findings under relevant statutes, or (2) the sentence is otherwise contrary to law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In reviewing a felony sentence, [t]he appellate court's standard for review is not whether the sentencing court abused its discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.