Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 OHIO 6870 - State v. Greathouse

State v. Greathouse’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Arizona v. Youngblood · State v. Long · State v. Barnes · State v. Lott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must affirmatively demonstrate (1) that his rights were prejudiced, (2) that at the time of the motion to sever he provided the trial court with sufficient information so that it could weigh the considerations favoring joinder against [his] right to a fair trial, and (3) that given the information provided to the court, it abused its discretion in refusing to separate the charges for trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] Crim.R. 14 analysis examines any prejudice resulting from [ ] joinder in light of the evidence introduced at trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.