Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 OHIO 7635 - State v. Hardy

State v. Hardy’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2019
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · State v. Bradley · State v. Dehass · Ohio v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident. In criminal cases, the proponent of evidence to be offered under this rule shall provide reasonable notice in advance of trial, or during trial if the court excuses pretrial notice on good cause shown, of the general nature of any such evidence it intends to introduce at trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “For the evidence to be excluded on this basis, 'the probative value must be minimal and the prejudice great.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.