Krlich v. Clemente’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
October 2021
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Dresher v. Burt · Temple v. Wean United, Inc. · Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is a question of law. Krlich v. Clemente, 11th Dist., 2017-Ohio-7945 , 98 N.E.3d 752 , ¶ 26 ; Jones v. Wheelersburg Local School Dist., 4th Dist. No. 12CA3513, 2013-Ohio-3685 , 2013 WL 4647645 , ¶ 41, citing Sturdevant v. Likely, 9th Dist. No. 12CA0024-M, 2013-Ohio-987 , 2013 WL 1096176 , ¶ 23 ; and Morrow v. Reminger & Reminger Co. L.P.A. , 183 Ohio App.3d 40 , 2009-Ohio-2665 , 915 N.E.2d 696 , ¶ 48 (10th Dist.) (Citations omitted.) {¶ 54} Absent an actual, contemporary physical injury, plaintiffs must establish that defendant intentionally or recklessly caused them”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'mere insults, indignities, threats, annoyances, petty oppressions, or other trivialities'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.