State v. Mobarak’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 802 (§ 102 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · Connally v. General Construction Co. · State v. Foster · United States v. Lanier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To determine whether a proposed expert's testimony about a scientific technique or a scientific methodology is scientifically reliable, the court focuses on factors identified by the United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals , 509 U.S. 579 [ 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 ] (1993) as adopted by the Supreme Court in Miller v. Bike Athletic Co. , 80 Ohio St.3d 607 , 611-12 [ 687 N.E.2d 735 ] (1998).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. R.T. v. Knobeloch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.