Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 OHIO 8039 - State v. Swing

State v. Swing’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
September 2021
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Phillips · Kastigar v. United States · State v. Burnside · Garrity v. State of New Jersey · Maryland v. Garrison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[e]vidence that an accused committed a crime other than the one for which he is on trial is not admissible when its sole purpose is to show the accused's propensity or inclination to commit crime or that he acted in conformity with bad character.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] jury is presumed to follow instructions given by the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.