Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 Ohio 8091 - State v. Snyder

State v. Snyder’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Smith · State v. Szefcyk · State v. Darmond · State v. Biros · State v. Ketterer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Courts, including this one, have applied res judicata to bar defendants from raising claims in a Crim.R. 32.1 postsentence motion to withdraw that they either raised or could have raised in a direct appeal from their judgment of conviction and sentence'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A motion made pursuant to Crim.R. 32.1 is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and the good faith, credibility and weight of the movant's assertions in support of the motion are matters to be resolved by that court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Ohio courts of appeals have applied res judicata to bar the assertion of claims in a motion to withdraw a guilty plea that were or could have been raised at trial or on appeal”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.