State v. Pierce’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2020
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miller-El v. Cockrell Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division · Batson v. Kentucky · State v. Thompkins · State v. Long · State v. Wolons
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'A trial court's finding of no discriminatory intent will not be reversed on appeal unless clearly erroneous.' State v. Pickens , 141 Ohio St. 3d 462 , 2014-Ohio-5445 , 25 N.E.3d 1023 , ¶ 64, citing State v. Frazier , 115 Ohio St. 3d 139 , 2007-Ohio-5048 , 873 N.E.2d 1263 , ¶ 64. This deferential standard arises from the fact that step three of the Batson inquiry turns largely on the evaluation of credibility by the trial court. See State v. Herring , 94 Ohio St.3d 246 , 257, 2002-Ohio-796 , 762 N.E.2d 940 , citing Batson , 476 U.S. at 98 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.