Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 Pa. Super. 106 - Commonwealth v. Akrie

2017 Pa. Super. 106 - Commonwealth v. Akrie’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Yohe · Commonwealth v. Sullivan · 2015 Pa. Super. 2 - Commonwealth v. Tejada · Foster v. Kane · Commonwealth v. Ivy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The admission of evidence is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and a trial court's ruling regarding the admission of evidence will not be disturbed on appeal unless that ruling reflects manifest unreasonableness, or partiality, prejudice, bias, or ill-will, or such lack of support to be clearly erroneous.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.