2017 Pa. Super. 118 - Commonwealth v. McGriff’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 2026
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Murray v. EDWARDS CTY. SHERIFF'S DEPT. · Commonwealth v. Spotz · Commonwealth v. Williams · Commonwealth v. Cousar · Commonwealth v. Cook
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Hearsay is an out-of-court statement offered for the truth of the matter asserted. Hearsay generally is inadmissible unless it falls within one of the exceptions to the hearsay rule delineated in the Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.