2017 Pa. Super. 215 - Commonwealth v. Barnes’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited
22 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · North Carolina v. Pearce · Alabama v. Smith · Commonwealth v. Anderson · 369 Pa. Super. 192 - Commonwealth v. Losch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Sentencing is a matter vested in the sound discretion of the [trial court], and a sentence will not be disturbed on appeal absent a manifest abuse of discretion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) whether appellant has filed a timely notice of appeal; (2) whether the issue was properly preserved at sentencing or in a motion to reconsider and modify sentence; (3) whether appellant's brief has a fatal defect pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 2119(f) ; and (4) whether there is a substantial question that the sentence appealed from is not appropriate under the Sentencing Code.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“any finding by the jury of serious bodily injury for aggravated assault could not be used to infer that the jury found serious bodily injury for the attempted murder charge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.