2017 Pa. Super. 261 - Commonwealth v. Yocolano’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
November 2025
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Petrillo · Commonwealth v. Drumheller · Commonwealth v. Johnson · Commonwealth v. Spotz · Commonwealth v. Davido
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) Rationally based on the witness's perception; (b) Helpful to clearly understanding the witness's testimony or to determining a fact in issue; and (c) Not based on scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge within the scope of Rule 702.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In the event of an erroneous admission of evidence, a verdict can still be sustained if the error was harmless.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“did not prejudice the defendant or the prejudice was de minimis”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.