2017 Pa. Super. 58 - Commonwealth v. Chambers’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Shiomos v. STATE EMP. RETIREMENT BD. · Mohamad v. Palestinian Authority · Devlin v. City of Philadelphia · Commonwealth v. Cupps · Commonwealth v. McCullum
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when he began punching [ ] Wilson, [he] prompted one or more of his unidentified cohorts to spray mace at [ ] Wilson, and is therefore criminally liable as an accomplice for their acts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“As discussed earlier in this opinion, this court found that there was sufficient evidence that [Chambers] was a co-conspirator to the assault using mace on [Wilson].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“agree[d] with the trial court's analysis and conclude[d] that the court did not err in holding [Chambers] liable as both an accomplice and a conspirator.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.