2017 Pa. Super. 78 - Commonwealth v. Poplawski’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2023
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 2007 Pa. Super. 40 - Commonwealth v. Harriott · Commonwealth v. Wright · 1999 Pa. Super. 32 - Commonwealth v. Dohner · Com. v. Dancey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we cannot determine whether this $41,637 ... was money [the complainant] would have had to expend to complete the project regardless of [Poplawski's] involvement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Commonwealth v. Weir“there was no causal connection between the crime for which [Poplawski] was convicted ... and the amount of said restitution[;]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Commonwealth v. Weir“amount was speculative and not supported by the record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Commonwealth v. Weir
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.