Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 SD 20 - State v. Spaniol

State v. Spaniol’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
October 2022
most recently cited

24 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Oregon v. Elstad · Pennsylvania v. Ritchie · Delaware v. Fensterer · Missouri v. Seibert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This right is generally satisfied when the defense is given a full and fair opportunity to probe and expose a witness'[s] infirmities through cross-examination, thereby calling to the attention of the factfinder the reasons for giving scant weight to the witness'[s] testimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, as applied to South Dakota through the Fourteenth Amendment, requires that in all criminal cases, the defendant has the right 'to be confronted with the witnesses against him.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The Confrontation Clause applies to witnesses testifying at trial and to the admission of hearsay.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.