Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 SD 26 - Doremus v. Morrow

Doremus v. Morrow’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2021
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Goeden v. Daum · March v. Thursby · Boever v. South Dakota Board of Accountancy · Shroyer v. Fanning · Erickson v. Earley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Ultimately, the question is whether the circuit court's findings sufficiently address the facts of the case under the specific elements of stalking at issue such that we may determine whether 'the evidence met the statutory elements of stalking.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is well-settled law that it is the [circuit] court's duty to make required findings of fact, and the failure to do so constitutes reversible error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[C]ourse of conduct means a pattern of conduct ... over a period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.