Oliver v. Utah Labor Comm'n’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
December 2025
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bowen v. Yuckert · Deal v. United States · Mcdonald v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Brady v. Heckler · Farris v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where both sides offer conceivable constructions of the language in question ... the statutory text may not be 'plain' when read in isolation, but may become so in light of its linguistic, structural, and statutory context.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In essence, statute[s] should be construed ... so that no part [or provision] will be inoperative or superfluous, void or insignificant, and so that one section will not destroy another.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Stewart“A proposed interpretation that is plausible in isolation may ... 'lose[ ] its persuasive effect when we [seek to] harmonize [it] with the rest of' the statutory scheme.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Stewart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.