Baumann v. Kroger Co.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “At minimum, Ms. Baumann did not preserve her argument that the district court erred in applying rule 26's sanctions instead of the more forgiving standard set forth in rule 16. And, on appeal, she does not argue that the plain error doctrine or exceptional circumstances warrant our reaching this unpreserved issue. Therefore, even if the invited error doctrine does not apply, Ms. Baumann has waived this issue.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Pulham v. Kirsling

2. “[It] enables us to analyze both the application of a legal rule or principle to a concrete and well-developed dispute and, nearly as important, the effect of the district court's ruling on the overall course of the proceedings below.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Salt Lake City v. Josephson

3. “One of the most important purposes of preservation is that it allows an issue to be fully factually, procedurally, and legally developed in the district court.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Salt Lake City v. Josephson