Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 UT 84 - State v. Allgier

State v. Allgier’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lafler v. Cooper · Missouri v. Frye · Lafler v. Cooper · Missouri v. Frye · State v. Menzies

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “does not allow defendants to work around the jurisdictional bar through the exceptions to preservation-plain error, exceptional circumstances, or ineffective assistance of counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The standard set forth in the Plea Withdrawal Statute is both a rule of preservation and a jurisdictional bar on appellate consideration of matters not properly preserved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “with respect to ineffective assistance of counsel or whether his plea was knowingly and voluntarily made can be pursued under the PCRA.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.