2017 UT App 11 - State v. Moosman’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Killpack · State v. Moa · 2003 UT App 432 - State v. Valdovinos · State v. Howell · 2013 UT App 160 - State v. Wimberly
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When there is evidence in the record showing a sentencing judge's reliance on specific information, we will not consider it improper for a judge to rely on such information if the evidence in question had indicia of reliability and was relevant in sentencing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Robinson“requires that a sentencing judge act on reasonably reliable and relevant information in exercising discretion in fixing a sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Robinson“It is the defendant's burden to demonstrate that the information relied upon was unreliable or irrelevant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Robinson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.