Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 UTAPP 150 - Vanderzon v. Vanderzon

Vanderzon v. Vanderzon’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Neztsosie · Mohamed v. United States · Jones v. Helms · State v. Holgate · In Re White

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(i) the financial condition and needs of the recipient spouse; (ii) the recipient's earning capacity or ability to produce income ...; (iii) the ability of the payor spouse to provide support; [and] (iv) the length of the marriage.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[District] courts have considerable discretion in determining alimony and determinations of alimony will be upheld on appeal unless a clear and prejudicial abuse of discretion is demonstrated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the expert's report addresse[d] all of the factors required by section 78B-12-203(7)(b)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.