Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 UTAPP 155 - Nicholson v. Nicholson

Nicholson v. Nicholson’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 2010 UT App 139 - Connell v. Connell · Paffel v. Paffel · Throckmorton v. Throckmorton · 2007 UT App 296 - Olsen v. Olsen · Whitehouse v. Whitehouse

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “disclose the steps by which the ultimate conclusion on each factual issue was reached”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.