2017 UT App 178 - State v. Irey’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2024
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 2003 UT App 432 - State v. Valdovinos · State v. Rhodes · State v. Neilson · 2015 UT App 48 - State v. Monroe · 2005 UT App 200 - State v. Moreno
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whether the trial court properly complied with a legal duty to resolve on the record the accuracy of contested information in sentencing reports is a question of law that we review for correctness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Vict. Asta“[w]e are not convinced that the district court's failure to resolve Defendant's objections requires reversal and resentencing,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Vict. Asta“[t]here is no indication in the record that the district court relied on the allegedly inaccurate information at sentencing,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Vict. Asta
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.