2017 UT App 179 - State v. Vu’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 2022
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Dunn · State v. Holgate · State v. Clark · State v. Dean
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To establish that the error should have been obvious to the trial court, [a defendant] must show that the law governing the error was clear at the time the alleged error was made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Guzman“Appellate courts review a trial court's decision to admit character evidence and prior bad acts under an abuse of discretion standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“even assuming [counsel's conduct] was deficient ... Vu [had] not demonstrated that this deficient performance prejudiced him”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.