2017 UT App 194 - State v. Patterson’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2025
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Carella v. California · State v. Holgate · State v. Hamilton · State v. Shumway
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When we review a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, we review the evidence and all inferences that may reasonably be drawn from it in the light most favorable to the jury's verdict,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jordan“vacate the conviction only when the evidence, so viewed, is sufficiently inconclusive or inherently improbable that reasonable minds must have entertained a reasonable doubt”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jordan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.