Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 UT App 2 - State v. Walker

2017 UT App 2 - State v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Chapman v. State of California · Blakely v. Washington · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Neder v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a distinction between determining whether the evidence [of serious bodily injury by way of strangulation] is sufficient to support a ... conviction and instructing the jury [that strangulation requires a finding of serious bodily injury] as a matter of law....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “other means or force likely to produce death or serious bodily injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “force likely to cause death or serious bodily injury”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.