2017 UT App 203 - State v. Miranda’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

11 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “for an error to require reversal, the likelihood of a different outcome must be sufficiently high to undermine confidence in the verdict”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Horvath · 2018 UT App 142 - State v. Argueta

2. “[t]he court may exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by a danger of one or more of the following: unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative evidence.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Barney · 2018 UT App 54 - Lee v. Williams

3. “In response, one juror raised his hand, and the court dismissed him for cause. ¶7 Following trial, the jury convicted Bryson. Bryson appeals. ISSUES AND STANDARDS OF REVIEW ¶8 Bryson first asserts that the district court erred in denying his motion to redact portions of the letter under rules 401, 402, and 403 of the Utah Rules of Evidence.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Bryson