Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 UTAPP 209 - McQuarrie v. McQuarrie

McQuarrie v. McQuarrie’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bradbury v. Valencia · Loffredo v. Holt · ProMax Development Corp. v. Raile

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a [district] court must determine the amount of attorney fees awardable to a party before the judgment becomes final for the purposes of an appeal”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[B]ecause rule 4(b)(1)(F) applies only to post-judgment motions for attorney fees and no such motion was filed,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “traditional case law concerning the finality of judgment for purposes of appeal still applies.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.