Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2017 UTAPP 219 - State v. Crespo

State v. Crespo’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Holgate · State v. Litherland · State v. Clark · State v. Nielsen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is raised for the first time on appeal, there is no lower court ruling to review and we must decide whether the defendant was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel as a matter of law.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]o prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, [Burnett] must demonstrate that counsel's performance was deficient and that the deficient performance was prejudicial-i.e., that it affected the outcome of the case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A remand under rule 23B is 'available only upon a nonspeculative allegation of facts, not fully appearing in the record on appeal, which, if true, could support a determination that counsel was ineffective.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.